Wednesday, February 18, 2026
No Result
View All Result
DOLLAR BITCOIN
Shop
  • Home
  • BTC → USD Calculator
    • 1 Bitcoin in USD Today (Live BTC Price)
    • How to Convert BTC to USD — Beginner Guide
  • Bitcoin
    • Bitcoin Price in USD — Live Updates (BTC to USD Today)
  • Blockchain
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Altcoin
  • Ethereum
  • DeFi
  • Legal Hub
  • More
    • Market & Analysis
    • Dogecoin
    • NFTs
    • XRP
    • Regulations
  • Shop
    • Bitcoin Book
    • Bitcoin Coin
    • Bitcoin Hat
    • Bitcoin Merch
    • Bitcoin Miner
    • Bitcoin Miner Machine
    • Bitcoin Shirt
    • Bitcoin Standard
    • Bitcoin Wallet
DOLLAR BITCOIN
No Result
View All Result
Home Bitcoin

Why do I get “Invalid Taproot control block size” when spending a P2TR script path?

by n70products
February 18, 2026
in Bitcoin
0
Why do I get “Invalid Taproot control block size” when spending a P2TR script path?
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


For this specific error, the usual suspects are double length-prefixing or accidentally including the annex. Double-prefixing is the one I see most often.

The control block has to be one witness stack element, raw bytes. Layout:

<1 byte: leaf_version | parity>
<32 bytes: internal key>
<32 bytes × depth: merkle path hashes>

(parity comes from the tweaked pubkey's y-coordinate odd/even—you'll have it if you derived Q correctly.) No compactSize inside. No splitting.

Your ser_string call — that's the problem. Witness serialization already length-prefixes each stack item. So when you do ser_string(control_block), you're adding an extra prefix. The node checks (len - 33) % 32 == 0; one extra byte and that check fails, hence Invalid Taproot control block size. Just concatenate:

control_block = b''.join([
    bytes([leaf_version | parity]),
    internal_pubkey,
    merkle_hash_1,
    merkle_hash_2
])

witness_stack = [preimage_or_sig, script, control_block]

Splitting into separate elements — also wrong. The node takes the last element as the control block. If you split, it only sees hash2 (32 bytes) or whatever is last, so the size check fails. You can also hit bad-witness-nonstandard before script validation, depending on policy.

Useful way to think about it: layer 1 is BIP 341's control block format (33+32m bytes, validated by that (len-33)%32==0 check). Layer 2 is witness encoding (length prefix per element). You only define layer 1; layer 2 is automatic. Don't mix them.

If dropping ser_string and using a single blob fixes it, that was the issue. I've reproduced this on regtest—toggle only the control block build and the behavior matches.

Refs: BIP 341, BIP 342.



Source link

Tags: BlockControlinvalidP2TRPathscriptSizeSpendingTaproot

Premium Content

Ether Reclaims K in Surprise Upward Move, Sellers are Weakening

Ether Reclaims $3K in Surprise Upward Move, Sellers are Weakening

January 10, 2026
XRP Price Surges on Strong Fundamentals, Outshining Bitcoin and Ethereum

XRP Price Surges on Strong Fundamentals, Outshining Bitcoin and Ethereum

November 11, 2025
Dogecoin Drops Below alt=

Dogecoin Drops Below $0.09 as Market Weakness Outweighs Musk Hype

February 7, 2026
XRP Price Bounces off From Crucial Support, Analyst Predicts Upside to .85

XRP Price Bounces off From Crucial Support, Analyst Predicts Upside to $5.85

December 16, 2025
Ethereum Leverage Remains At Record High: What Happens Next?

Ethereum Leverage Remains At Record High: What Happens Next?

January 29, 2026
ANTMINER 2021 Customer Satisfaction Survey

ANTMINER 2021 Customer Satisfaction Survey

January 27, 2026

Recent Posts

  • Why Dogecoin Could Repeat History And What The Outcome Would Be
  • Why your EV’s battery will outlive your phone’s battery – and by how much
  • Institutional Investors Sell $3,740,000,000 in Bitcoin and Crypto in Just One Month As BTC Price Craters: CoinShares

Categories

  • Altcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Cryptocurrency
  • DeFi
  • Dogecoin
  • Ethereum
  • Market & Analysis
  • NFTs
  • Regulations
  • XRP

Recommended

Why Dogecoin Could Repeat History And What The Outcome Would Be

Why Dogecoin Could Repeat History And What The Outcome Would Be

February 18, 2026
Why your EV’s battery will outlive your phone’s battery – and by how much

Why your EV’s battery will outlive your phone’s battery – and by how much

February 18, 2026

© 2025 Dollar-Bitcoin | All Rights Reserved

Feature

U.S. Regulated
 

Close the CTA

Beginner Friendly
 

Advanced Tools
 

Free Bitcoin Offer
 

Mobile App
 

10$

5$

Varies
 

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • BTC → USD Calculator
    • 1 Bitcoin in USD Today (Live BTC Price)
    • How to Convert BTC to USD — Beginner Guide
  • Bitcoin
    • Bitcoin Price in USD — Live Updates (BTC to USD Today)
  • Blockchain
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Altcoin
  • Ethereum
  • DeFi
  • Legal Hub
  • More
    • Market & Analysis
    • Dogecoin
    • NFTs
    • XRP
    • Regulations
  • Shop
    • Bitcoin Book
    • Bitcoin Coin
    • Bitcoin Hat
    • Bitcoin Merch
    • Bitcoin Miner
    • Bitcoin Miner Machine
    • Bitcoin Shirt
    • Bitcoin Standard
    • Bitcoin Wallet

© 2025 Dollar-Bitcoin | All Rights Reserved