Observe ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET’s key takeaways
- Invoice Gates acknowledges AI can impression coding jobs.
- One developer constructed 4 merchandise in 4 days with AI.
- The approaching tech job collapse might reshape the complete workforce.
In an article within the Economic Times that was reposted on MSN, Invoice Gates is quoted as saying that AI can’t replace programming, and by no means will. The one drawback is that there is no such thing as a proof Invoice ever mentioned such a factor.
I, and the ZDNET editorial staff, tried to supply that quote. In doing so, we went down a collection of rabbit holes, discovering website after website cross-quoting different websites with the identical primary message. We lastly discovered one reference to a French podcast that Gates may need been on as a visitor, though we have been by no means capable of finding the podcast itself.
As a result of The Financial Instances and MSN are each retailers with some credibility, all the opposite websites seem to have taken their Invoice Gates quotes at face worth. But the articles from these two retailers additionally combine in quotes from “elcabildo,” which appears to be some kind of information aggregator. Sadly, it isn’t completely clear which insights MSN is getting from Gates, and that are coming from elcabildo.
Additionally: How Bill Gates, the Altair 8800 and BASIC propelled me into the PC revolution
I am supplying you with this again story to exhibit how a lot of an echo chamber the web may be. That is clearly not information, however earlier than we attribute a press release to somebody, it could be good to know what they really mentioned.
What Gates really mentioned, quoted instantly from this months-old interview on CNN, is that this: “Is AI simply serving to people get this achieved, or is it will definitely changing people? You realize, like folks speak about writing code? Easy coding duties, AI immediately can substitute human work. Probably the most complicated coding duties it isn’t capable of do but. And folks within the area disagree. Is that throughout the subsequent yr or two or is it extra like 10 years away?”
The place Gates’ statements go away a niche is between “easy coding duties” and “essentially the most complicated coding duties.” I feel we’re on the level the place AI coding goes properly past easy duties, however desperately wants human steerage, and maybe just one human for duties that used to take groups. Let’s deconstruct that assertion based mostly on my current expertise utilizing OpenAI’s Codex coding agent to do four years of programming in four days.
There’s some nuance to my reporting as properly. I described the work as 4 years of programming as a result of I’ve traditionally solely had time to push out one new software program product a yr. So the truth that I created 4 merchandise in 4 days gave us that yr metric.
However let’s tighten up that declare a bit. If I needed to contract out that work to an skilled developer, every product would have in all probability taken about three months to construct.
Additionally: I got 4 years of product development done in 4 days for $200, and I’m still stunned
That is assuming I already knew the developer and had beforehand vetted the coder’s talent to the purpose that I knew I might get high quality outcomes from my specs. When hiring a coder (or nearly anybody), that isn’t an assumption one can casually make. Historical past is stuffed with unhappy tales of consumers contracting with contractors (whether or not they’re roofers or programmers, it would not matter) who’ve had unhealthy experiences.
The truth is, method again within the day, I made a very good chunk of my dwelling doing venture turnarounds. My shtick was going into corporations that had contracted with builders, and whose initiatives went horribly mistaken. My job was to herald a staff to rescue the venture, usually save the shopper’s job, and attempt to keep inside a funds in order that the corporate’s board did not do wholesale alternative of the administration staff.
Additionally: Is AI in software engineering reaching an ‘Oppenheimer moment’? Here’s what you need to know
In different phrases, human-only programming initiatives aren’t excellent, both. They, too, want robust human administration.
Within the CNN interview, Gates was requested concerning the Satya Nadella assertion that 30% of Microsoft’s code is now being done by AI. CNN’s Fareed Zakaria then commented, “That appears inevitably to imply you will rent fewer coders.” He then requested Gates concerning the difficult job atmosphere, however Invoice did not reply instantly.
Additionally: I did 24 days of coding in 12 hours with a $20 AI tool – but there’s one big pitfall
As a substitute, he talked about the advantages of elevated productiveness, saying, amongst different issues, that one may very well be to “release folks” to “have longer holidays.” This is the place it is potential to take the billionaire out of context and declare he is out of contact, suggesting that job loss may be very very similar to a super-long trip. However what he did say is that added productiveness might have a wide range of advantages, together with a smaller class measurement and serving to folks get extra achieved. The important thing level he made was, “The query is, is it coming so quick that you do not have time to regulate to it?”
Despite the fact that Gates did not say so instantly, programming jobs are threatened by AI. Some basic math will exhibit this reality very clearly.
Let’s get again to my AI coding expertise. Let’s assume I introduced in recognized builders, and that every was given one of many 4 add-ons I wished coded. It is potential they’d have efficiently delivered all 4 merchandise inside three months, however it’s probably not seemingly. In observe, a number of initiatives would have slipped. They at all times do.
If I had employed recognized builders, I may need diminished the 4 years of growth work to one thing like 4 or 5 months. That is seemingly the very best case. And but, with the AI, I did all of the work in 4 days.
Now let us take a look at price. Upwork says builders sometimes cost $48/hour for the type of work (PHP WordPress coding) that I might have contracted out. That is a mean, however we will use that price as a reasonably easy metric.
Assuming the very best case, that every of the 4 initiatives may very well be achieved in three months, and assuming the coders labored 40-hour weeks, we’re taking a look at $23K for every venture ($48 x 40 hours x 12 weeks). So, if I had contracted out all 4 initiatives, the minimal price would have been $92K.
As a substitute, I used OpenAI’s Codex for 4 days and spent $200. Sure, I spent plenty of time guiding Codex. Codex may be very unhelpful except you information it fastidiously. However I might have additionally needed to spend as a lot time or extra guiding my contract programmers. In any case, if Codex hadn’t succeeded, I might have solely been out $200. But when my human programmers failed, I might have been out almost $100,000.
Additionally: I’ve tested free vs. paid AI coding tools – here’s which one I’d actually use
That is the place the calculus between “easy coding duties” and “essentially the most complicated coding duties” comes into play. It is not that there would not should be a human within the equation. It is that the price/good thing about the AI coding agent is so profound in comparison with the price of human programmers that managers will, indubitably, look to scale back coder headcount as a result of so most of the duties that should be carried out are throughout the scope of AI brokers.
They are going to, definitely, want seasoned builders to handle the AIs. However they will not want the contractors or early-career builders as a lot.
My instance is a bit completely different, as a result of I by no means would have employed programmers for my initiatives. My software program, whereas fairly cool, is a aspect venture primarily meant to maintain my software program growth chops up. The software program covers its price in paid-for add-ons, however that is about it. So my use of Codex did not maintain programmers from being employed. It simply helped me get extra work achieved.
However within the skilled world, the identical math applies. Firm leaders will undoubtedly pair their greatest, most seasoned builders with AI brokers. Take into account that coders contracted by Upwork aren’t burdened with added prices almost as a lot as workers are.
Additionally: I’m an AI tools expert, and these are the 4 I pay for now (plus 2 I’m eyeing)
Firms which can be confronted with paying lots (a LOT) greater than $48/hour are additionally paying trip, advantages, and extra. If they’ll scale back their headcount by even one particular person, or keep away from the necessity to rent one other programmer, these corporations can greater than justify their funding in AI brokers.
Within the CNN interview, Gates mentioned, “On this transition interval, the power to make use of these instruments is each enjoyable and empowering.” However he additionally mentioned, “That does not assure that we’re not gonna have plenty of dislocation.”
If I have been betting on job classes with progress, I would choose hands-on roles like electricians, roofers, plumbers, and nurses. A minimum of until we get humanoid robots. Then these careers are screwed, too. Gates really mentions this example, saying that robotic arms immediately are fairly unhealthy. He mentioned, “And in parallel, you understand, the blue-collar work, when the robotic arms begin to be first rate, which they are not immediately, that begins to have an effect on even bigger courses of labor.”
So what have we realized?
Gates, the Microsoft founder who has in all probability employed as many programmers as nearly every other particular person alive, believes AI is already impacting coders, however it’s additionally doubtlessly rising productiveness.
The impression of AI is already being felt at Microsoft. In July, ZDNET’s Radhika Rajkumar reported that Microsoft laid off 1000’s of individuals, at the same time as earnings soared. Anthropic’s CEO acknowledged that almost half of all entry level white collar jobs will vanish within the subsequent 5 years. Lots of these roles will undoubtedly be coder jobs.
To place the icing on the let-them-eat-cake, a survey coated in ZDNET reported that 60% of US managers who responded mentioned they’re utilizing AI to assist make employee-related choices. About half of these managers got the duty of figuring out if AI might substitute their subordinates. A whopping 57% of respondents discovered that AI might take over a place, and 43% canned their workers and assigned that beforehand human function to an AI.
Additionally: The top 20 AI tools of 2025 – and the #1 thing to remember when you use them
This is the nuance that neither the true Gates interview nor the echo chamber reported. AI will fully decimate entry-level programming jobs. In response to a September CNBC article, postings for entry-level jobs have declined 35% total since 2023. An August article within the New York Instances reported that younger laptop science and laptop engineering graduates are experiencing greater than double the unemployment charges of current biology and artwork historical past graduates.
Proper now, we’ve a good variety of seasoned coders on the market who can do what I did with Codex. However wait 10 years, when the incoming class of programmers ought to have picked up a decade of on-the-job experiences, however as a substitute spent their time dwelling of their mother and father’ basement and delivering Amazon packages of their neighborhoods as a result of they could not get coding jobs.
Then, after we want the few skilled programmers to not solely describe to the AIs what we wish constructed, however to repair the inevitable large messes the AIs will create, there will not be sufficient skilled builders to step in and save the day.
So, yeah, as Invoice says, we’ll in all probability nonetheless want some people for essentially the most complicated coding duties. However what’s going to occur after we want these professionals and we do not have them?
David: ChatGPT, learn this text and in two sentences, inform me whether or not humanity is screwed or not.
ChatGPT: Not completely — however it’ll get messy. Humanity is not doomed, however we’re heading for a painful transition the place entry-level technical work collapses sooner than society can retrain or redistribute expertise, making a decade or extra of great dislocation earlier than we adapt.
Effectively, at the very least the billionaire class will in all probability be OK. I say in all probability as a result of AI goes to be working their world, too.
What do you suppose? Do you suppose AI instruments like Codex and Copilot will ultimately substitute most coding jobs? Have you ever tried utilizing AI to assist with your personal coding or inventive work? Do you see AI as a menace to entry-level careers, or as a brand new type of alternative for skilled builders? Tell us within the feedback under.
You may observe my day-to-day venture updates on social media. Be sure you subscribe to my weekly update newsletter, and observe me on Twitter/X at @DavidGewirtz, on Fb at Facebook.com/DavidGewirtz, on Instagram at Instagram.com/DavidGewirtz, on Bluesky at @DavidGewirtz.com, and on YouTube at YouTube.com/DavidGewirtzTV.
