Bitcoin price rallied 1,550% the last time the ‘BTC risk-off’ metric fell this low


Key Takeaways:

  • The Bitcoin Threat-Off sign dropped to 23.7, its lowest since March 2019, indicating low correction threat and a excessive chance of a bullish pattern creating.

  • Regardless of the current decline in community exercise, bullish macro indicators just like the Macro Chain Index (MCI) recommend Bitcoin might quickly rally above $100,000.

On Could 5, the Bitcoin Threat-Off sign, an indicator that makes use of onchain and alternate knowledge to evaluate correction threat, dropped to its lowest degree (23.7) for the primary time since March 27, 2019, when Bitcoin (BTC) traded at $4,000. The sign is presently within the blue zone, which traditionally suggests low correction threat and a excessive chance of a bullish pattern. When the oscillator rises above 60 or turns pink, it implies a excessive threat of bearish motion. 

0196a5f6 1fe7 7927 b5dc 1dee5781b591
Bitcoin Threat-Off sign indicator. Supply: CryptoQuant

In 2019, the identical sign preceded a staggering 1,550% rally that noticed Bitcoin soar above $68,000 in 2021. 

Knowledge from CryptoQuant indicates that the Threat-Off sign combines six metrics: draw back and upside volatility, alternate inflows, funding charges, futures open curiosity, and market capitalization. Collectively, they supply a balanced view of correction threat, making the sign a data-oriented gauge for market developments. 

The final time the Threat-Off Sign indicated a low-risk funding atmosphere, Bitcoin was valued at $4,000. A number of elements can clarify the value disparity. 

The launch of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) within the US in 2024 opened the floodgates to institutional capital, boosting demand and stabilizing costs. In actual fact, ETFs and public firms now maintain 9% of the Bitcoin provide. 

Data from Fidelity Digital Assets noted that Bitcoin’s volatility has decreased three to 4 occasions that of fairness indexes, down from triple-digit volatility in its early years, as illustrated within the chart under. Between 2019 and 2025, the 1-year annualized realized volatility dropped by greater than 80%.

This maturing market absorbs capital inflows with much less worth disruption. Thus, rising mainstream adoption, regulatory readability, and Bitcoin’s rising position as a hedge in opposition to inflation have bolstered its worth, setting a better worth ground in comparison with 2019.

0196a5fb 68e4 73ee bed2 b742debe5e3e
Bitcoin 1-year realized volatility vs Bitcoin worth. Supply: Glassnode

Related: Bitcoin price forms two BTC futures gaps after Coinbase premium flips negative

Bitcoin macro indicators flash bullish indicators

Cointelegraph not too long ago reported that the Macro Chain Index (MCI), a composite of onchain and macroeconomic metrics, flashed a purchase sign for the primary time since 2022, when it precisely predicted the market backside at $15,500.

Traditionally, MCI’s RSI crossover has preceded huge rallies, such because the greater than 500% surge in 2019. Mixed with rising futures open curiosity and favorable funding charges, the MCI suggests Bitcoin might break $100,000 over the approaching few weeks. 

Nameless crypto analyst Darkfost pointed out that Bitcoin’s community exercise index has declined sharply, reflecting decreased transaction quantity and fewer every day energetic addresses since December 2024. The drop in UTXOs additional signifies waning demand for block area, a sample usually seen in bear markets.

Cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin Price, Volatility, Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis, Bitcoin ETF
Bitcoin Community exercise index. Supply: CryptoQuant

Nevertheless, the analyst defined that it doesn’t verify a bearish outlook. Macro indicators stay strongly bullish, suggesting this lull could possibly be a strategic entry level for long-term buyers. 

Related: How much Bitcoin can Berkshire Hathaway buy?

This text doesn’t include funding recommendation or suggestions. Each funding and buying and selling transfer includes threat, and readers ought to conduct their very own analysis when making a choice.