Enterprise capital agency Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) referred to as on US lawmakers to revise a draft crypto regulation invoice, warning that the proposed framework might open harmful loopholes and undermine investor protections.
In a Thursday open letter to the US Senate Banking Committee, the funding agency urged regulators to shut loopholes within the draft crypto laws. The letter was a response to the discussion draft released in late July.
The dialogue draft in query builds on the 21st Century Financial Innovation and Technology Act (CLARITY Act) and seeks business enter on the continued crypto regulation. A16z factors to the definition of ancillary property, referring to tokens bought with an funding contract that give patrons no fairness, dividend or governance rights.
“The ancillary asset assemble shouldn’t function the inspiration for laws with out important modifications,” the letter stated.
Associated: A16z doubles down on LayerZero with $55M investment
A16z pushes for “digital commodity” mannequin
A16z stated the present method fails to resolve core points going through crypto markets and can be incompatible with the Howey take a look at, the long-standing authorized benchmark for outlining securities.
The funding agency stated this method “won’t resolve the challenges going through crypto market members.” As a substitute, the agency really useful adopting the CLARITY Act’s narrower “digital commodity” framework, which it stated would offer larger certainty whereas preserving regulatory simplicity.
A16z additionally stated “the Howey take a look at stays a important part of US securities regulation” and will keep in its present type. A prompt answer was to “codify a modernized software suited to ancillary property.”
It described proposed modifications to the Howey take a look at as “pointless—and harmful—as a result of it seeks to rewrite Howey in a manner that departs from settled regulation and undermines investor protections.” It added:
“These modifications should not merely problematic—they’re incompatible with the broader structure of U.S. securities regulation.“
Insider gross sales needs to be restricted
A16z additionally stated that making use of securities regulation to major transactions and commodity rules for secondary transactions creates a loophole, permitting issuers to promote ancillary property to insiders below exemptions, after which resell within the public market with out coming below securities rules.
As an answer, the funding agency prompt requiring the tasks to realize decentralization by eliminating mechanisms of management. Making use of switch restrictions by way of these means “can shut loopholes that will in any other case come up,” the letter stated.
In accordance with a16z, this is able to additionally forestall insider enrichment on the expense of public traders and be certain that the excellence between the first and secondary markets remained significant:
“As soon as management is relinquished and the mission is decentralized, these restrictions ought to fall away, because the asset’s belief dependencies now resemble these of a commodity.“
Associated: Trump plans to pick a16z head of policy Brian Quintenz as CFTC chair: Report
A control-based decentralization framework
The corporate urged that regulators ought to undertake a control-based decentralization framework, which it stated “is the suitable strategy to consider the evolution of an ancillary asset’s threat profile.”
The letter stated this method “needs to be centered on whether or not any occasion retains unilateral authority—operational, financial, or governance—over the blockchain system.” This, based on a16z, needs to be thought-about when making use of the Howey take a look at:
“Howey shouldn’t be deserted. As a substitute, Congress ought to codify the ideas underlying Howey for property below a control-based decentralization framework.”
Shield the plumbers, not the pipes
A16z additional stated that the US Securities and Alternate Fee’s (SEC) previous give attention to the “efforts of others” facet of the Howey take a look at “has created important perverse incentives.”
It stated this results in decrease transparency, exposes customers to undisclosed dangers and stalls innovation. The letter additionally stated that being concerned with the expertise on the foundation of crypto shouldn’t infringe on securities regulation.
“Laws ought to make clear that core expertise features essential for the operation of decentralized blockchain programs—equivalent to working consensus algorithms, mining, staking, and executing sensible contracts—don’t, in and of themselves, represent regulated monetary exercise below US securities or commodities legal guidelines,” the letter stated.
Journal: How crypto laws are changing across the world in 2025
